Petitioners had been barred from the First Semester Examination. Court was informed they had since been permitted to appear, grievance redressed; writ petition disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
30.07.2024.
PB Sl. No.25. Ct. No.14.
In The High Court At Calcutta Constitution Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side
WPA 18544 of 2024
Kevin Rohan Latt & Ors. Vs Baba Saheb Ambedkar Education University & Ors.
Mr. Tirthankar Dey.
……for the petitioners.
Mr. Anindya Bose, Mr. Mridul Biswas.
……for the College.
Mr. Amitabrata Roy, Ms. Deboleena Ghosh.
…….for the University.
Learned advocate representing the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been permitted to appear in the First Semester Examination and as such their grievance has been redressed.
In view of such submission, the writ petition stands disposed of.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties as early as possible.
(Amrita Sinha, J.)
Kevin Rohan Latt & Ors.
Baba Saheb Ambedkar Education University & Ors.
Amrita Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
