Writ petition dismissed for default as petitioners failed to appear or seek adjournment on two consecutive occasions while the University was represented.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
42 20.09.2024 NB Ct. 17
WPA 20224 of 2024
Debabrata Roy & Ors. Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Nilotpal Chatterjee, Mr. Sourabh Sengupta. …for the CU.
No one appears on behalf of the petitioners although the University is represented.
On the last occasion i.e. on 19.09.2024 when the matter was called on for hearing, no one represented the petitioners or prayed for any adjournment.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for default.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order may be supplied to the parties expeditiously, if applied for.
(Jay Sengupta, J.)
Debabrata Roy & Ors.
The State of West Bengal
Jay Sengupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
