The petitioner failed to appear before the court when the matter was called. With no accommodation prayed for, the court dismissed the writ petition on the ground of default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Ml24.09.2024 209 Ct.18 rkd
W.P.A. 15164 of 2023
Samapti Bhattacharya
-vs-
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Pinaki Dhole, Md. Ziaur Rahaman
….for the State.
At the time of call no one appears on behalf of the petitioner and no accommodation is prayed for.
However, State respondents are
represented by learned advocates.
The writ petition stands dismissed on the ground of default.
Urgent photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon usual undertakings.
(Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)
Samapti Bhattacharya
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Saugata Bhattacharyya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
