Multiple writ petitions against the State of West Bengal were dismissed for default as no one appeared for the petitioners on repeated occasions and no accommodation was sought. Interim orders, if any, stood vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
JPG 01 to 09 19.08.2024 d.p.
Calcutta High Court In the Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri Appellate Jurisdiction
W.P.A. 16 of 2021
Md. Nawaj Sarif -versus The State of West Bengal & Ors.
With
W.P.A. 17 of 2021
Mir Mortaja Ahmed
-vs-
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
With
W.P.A. 19 of 2021
Ayub Ali
-vs-
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
With
W.P.A. 22 of 2021
Hasina Begam
-vs-
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
With
W.P.A. 25 of 2021
Nilangshu Chakraborty
-vsThe State of West Bengal & Ors.
With
W.P.A. 27 of 2021
Babita Roy -vs-
2
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
With
W.P.A. 30 of 2021
Selima Akter Zan
-vsThe State of West Bengal & Ors.
With
W.P.A. 32 of 2021
Sudipta Mallick
-vs-
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
With
W.P.A 54 of 2021
Mainul Hossain
-vs-
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
None appears on behalf of the petitioner on repeated occasions. No accommodation sought.
All the aforesaid writ petitions stand dismissed for default. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order be supplied to the parties, if applied for, as early as possible.
(Amrita Sinha, J.)
Md. Nawaj Sarif
The State of West Bengal
Mir Mortaja Ahmed
Ayub Ali
Hasina Begam
Nilangshu Chakraborty
Amrita Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
