Correction of a typographical error in an earlier order dated August 23, 2024, changing 'interested' to 'not interested' regarding the petitioners' intention to proceed with the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
01
04.10.2024
mb
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE
W.P.A. No. 17449 of 2019
Sri Bani Pada Saha & Ors. Vs.
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Sk. Md. Galib, Mr. Abu Siddiqaue Mallik …for the Board of Auqaf
This matter was directed to appear under the heading “To Be Mentioned” for correction of a typographical error in the order dated August 23, 2024.
In paragraph no. 2 of the said order, it was inadvertently recorded that “It appears from the record that the petitioners are interested to proceed with this matter” instead of “ It appears from the record that the petitioners are not interested to proceed with this matter ”.
Let the aforesaid error be rectified.
Let this order form part of the order dated August 23, 2024.
(Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.)
Sri Bani Pada Saha & Ors.
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Hiranmay Bhattacharyya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
