Contempt application filed after a writ petition; the contemnor's counsel submitted that the reasoned ordered pursuant to an earlier court order had been passed, and the court disposed of the contempt application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
22.08.2024 Item No.14 gd/ssd
CPAN 427 OF 2024 BISHU HANSDA VS PAPIYA DE IN WPA 2435 OF 2023 BISHU HANSDA VS
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
Mr. Habibur Rahman
..for the petitioner.
Mr. Pantu Deb Roy, Mr. Pannalal Bandopadhyay ..for the contemnor.
Mr. Deb Roy, learned Advocate for the alleged contemnor submits that the reasoned order pursuant to the order dated 14th September, 2023 has been passed.
A copy of such order which has filed in Court is taken on record.
Let a copy of such order be supplied to the learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner in course of this day.
The petitioner will be at liberty to take appropriate steps in this regard, if so advised.
The contempt application stands disposed of.
(HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)
Bishu Hansda
Papiya De
Hiranmay Bhattacharyya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
