A CISF personnel challenged his transfer order to Assam. Following his superannuation on 31 January 2022, the challenge became infructuous and the writ petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPA 12135 of 2017 Gopal Chakraborty
N.22Sl Gopal Chakraborty 151/CL v. 03.09.24 Union of India & Ors. Sl-68 Ct.33 Ms. Pampa Dey Dhamal (S.R.) Ms. Sangita Banerjee … for the petitioner. Mr. Sunil Kr. Singhania … for the respondent/UOI.
The learned advocate for the petitioner as well as the respondent/UOI are present.
The learned advocate representing the respondent/UOI has filed an affidavit stating that the petitioner has retired from his service on 31st January, 2022. A copy of the order issued with regard to his superannuation from service has also been annexed along with the affidavit. Let the same be kept on record.
The petitioner, namely, Gopal Chakraborty had challenged “Movement order” issued under Memo No.E380/3/CISF/DVC/IUT-2017/2016/1920 dated 14th December, 2016 praying for an order from this Court directing the concerned department to withdraw/cancel/rescind the purported order of transfer of the petitioner from CISF Unit Haldia Dock Complex to Assam.
On his superannuation from service, the prayer of the petitioner has become infructuous.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
(Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the transfer order dated 14 December 2016 from CISF Unit Haldia Dock Complex to Assam should be withdrawn or cancelled.
Gopal Chakraborty
Union of India
Ananya Bandyopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
