The writ petition was dismissed for default as the petitioner failed to appear despite multiple list dates. Interim orders, if any, were vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
02.09.2024 Ct. No.33 Sl. No.34 cm WPA 30546 of 2017
Gopal Dutta With Union of India & Ors.
None appeared for the petitioner and no accommodation was sought, when the matter was called on 22nd August, 2024, 23rd August, 2024 and 27th August, 2024. Today also when the matter is called, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. No accommodation is sought.
Accordingly, instant writ petition is dismissed for default.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Should the writ petition be dismissed for default due to the petitioner's non-appearance?
Gopal Dutta
Union of India
Ananya Bandyopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
