This order addressed two applications: condoning a 304-day delay in filing a Motor Appeals Tribunal appeal, and dismissing an intra-court appeal as the originating writ petition was already finally disposed of.
I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2023 allowed to condone delay; M.A.T. 1999 of 2023 dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
03.01.2024
3
PG/KS Ct. No.1
M.A.T. 1999 of 2023 With
I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2023 With I.A. No. CAN 2 of 2023
Anita Samaddar (Ukil) Versus Jayanta Sen & ors.
Mr. Subhojit Seal Mr. Dibyendu Ghosh ……for the appellant
Mr. Sk. Md. Galib Ms. Sujata Mukherjee …..for the State
Mr. Ayan Bhattacharjee Mr. Samrat Choudhury Mr. Anit Dey…….for the respondent no.1/ writ petitioner
In Re:. I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2023
In Re:. M.A.T. 1999 of 2023
2
( T.S SIVAGNANAM) CHIEF JUSTICE
(SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA, J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay of 304 days in filing an intra-Court appeal justifies condoning the limitation.
Whether any substantive part of the impugned interim order survives for appeal after the writ petition is finally disposed of.
Anita Samaddar (Ukil)
Jayanta Sen
T.S. Sivagnanam
Supratim Bhattacharya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
