Bench. However, the facts of the present case compels us to take a different view. This is so because there appears to have been a dispute between the respondent/writ petitioner and the appellant, the owner of the premises. The respondent/writ petitioner has filed a title suit in Title Suit No.1562 of 2022 on the file of the 3rd Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Alipore. In the said suit, an application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure was taken out, wherein the respondent/writ petitioner prayed for an order of temporary injunction from interfering with his enjoyment of all the essential services, which included supply of electricity and water. An ex parte order was passed by the learned Trial Judge on 28th September, 2021. Subsequently, the appellant/owner of the premises entered appearance and put forth his case and the learned Trial Court by order dated 11th April, 2023 has dismissed the application for temporary injunction. Thus, it can be seen that the prayers sought for in the interlocutory application in the title suit and the prayer sought for in the writ petition are identical. One more fact, which is to be taken note of is that the respondent/writ petitioner did not approach the learned writ Court with clean hands. We say so because in paragraph 6 of the writ petition, though the respondent/writ petitioner mentions
