First appeal dismissed for default on the second occasion when no one appeared to argue. Interim order, if any, vacated; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
AD-35 Ct No.16 09.12.2024 TN
FMA 472 of 2023 IA No: CAN 1 of 2023
Uttam Kumar Roy and another Vs. Prodip Kumar Roy and another
(Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.)
(Supratim Bhattacharya, J.)
Uttam Kumar Roy
Prodip Kumar Roy
Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya
Supratim Bhattacharya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
