Dismissed
Sk Naser & Anr. v. Sk Hatem & Ors.
Calcutta HCFA/17/2021
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Court of two judges dismissed an appeal as it appeared the appellant was not ready to move the appeal and ordered the matter to go out of list.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
AD – 7 Ct No.16 19.02.2026 (SSS)
¶2
FA 17 of 2021 with CAN 1 of 2018 (Old No: CAN 7927 of 2018) with CAN 2 of 2024 with CAN 4 of 2024
¶3
Sk. Naser and Anr. Vs.
¶4
Sk. Hatem and Ors.
¶5
Mr. Saikat Gayen
¶6
…..for the appellants.
¶7
Mr. Atish Santra
¶8
….for the respondent nos. 1 & 3.
¶9
- Even on the second call, it is apparent that learned counsel for the appellants is not ready to move the appeal.
¶10
- Accordingly, let the matter go out of the list.
¶11
(Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.)
¶12
(Supratim Bhattacharya, J.)
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Sk. Naser
- respondent
Sk. Hatem
Coram
AI extract
Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Calcutta HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- FA/17/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court