Tanmoy Biswas and Others v. Prosenjeet Nath and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Clerical/date-correction order dated 17.05.2024 in CRR 908 of 2023 (Tanmoy Biswas & Ors.), Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta, by Tirthankar Ghosh, J.: records that the previous order’s date was wrongly recorded as ’03-15-2024’ (correct date 03.05.24); treats this order as part and parcel of the 03.05.24 order; directs the Department to correct the record; remaining contents unchanged. No statutory provisions, cited cases, framed issues or quantum appear. Counsel: Kushal Kumar Mukherjee, Surajit Basu, Pritam Chakraborty (petitioners); Abhra Mukherjee, Sauradeep Dutta (o.p. no. 1); Prasun Kr. Datta, Nirupam Dhali (the State).
What did the court decide?
Administrative correction of the date erroneously recorded on the previous order: the present order is to be treated as part and parcel of the order dated 03.05.24 (wrongly recorded as 03-15-24), and the Department is directed to effect the correction; the other part of the order remains unchanged.