Revisional application CRR 24 of 2024 was dismissed as not pressed by the petitioners who withdrew the proceedings. Certified copy to be returned.
Certified copy to be returned to the petitioner after replacement with photostat.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
02.05.2024
Item No.35 Ct.No.34 dc.
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION
C.R.R. 24 of 2024
In the matter of : Mamata Parida & Ors. … Petitioners.
Mr. Pinak Kumar Mitra, Mr. Soumon Nanda … For the Petitioners.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners has filed Vakalatnama. Let the same be kept with the record.
Mr. Mitra, learned advocate for the petitioners submits that the petitioners do not intend to proceed with the present revisional application. To that effect, written instructions received from the petitioners has been submitted before this Court. Let the same be also kept with the record.
Accordingly, the revisional application being CRR 24 of 2024 is dismissed as not pressed.
Pending connected application, if any, is consequently disposed of.
Learned advocate for the petitioners prays for return of the certified copy.
Department is directed to return the certified copy to the learned advocate-on-record of the petitioners after the same is replaced by photostat copy.
All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
2
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)
Mamata Parida & Ors.
Tirthankar Ghosh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
