Revision application withdrawn by the petitioner on written instruction; dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
06.03.2024
Serial no. 11 [G.S.D]
CRR 3914 of 2023 With CRAN 1 of 2023
In the matter of : Uma Shankar Agarwal
… … Petitioner
Mr. Jayanta Datta Mr. Atanu Mondal
… for the petitioner
Ld. Advocate for the petitioner submits that he has
instruction not to proceed with the case.
Accordingly, CRR 3914 of 2023 is dismissed as not pressed.
Pending application, if any, is also disposed of.
Written instruction, so submitted, be kept with the record.
Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)
Uma Shankar Agarwal
Tirthankar Ghosh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
