Revisional application disposed of as infructuous after the Superintendent of Police, Purulia reported, with death certificate, that the petitioner had died during pendency. Personal appearance of opposite party No. 2 dispensed with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
06.02.2024 17 cm
CRR 2885 of 2012
In the matter of : Sudhanshu Bhakat
…. petitioner.
Mr. Soumik Ganguli Mr. Dilip Kumar Sadhu Ms. Chandana Chakraborty
… for the opposite party No. 2.
The learned advocate for the opposite party No. 2 is present.
In compliance with the order dated 20.12.2023 the opposite party No. 2 is present in Court today. Her personal appearance is noted and dispensed with.
The report filed by Superintendent of Police, District Purulia stated that the petitioner i.e. Sudhanshu Bhakat to have expired on 13.07.2021 supported by a copy of the death certificate. Let the said report be kept on record.
Under such circumstances, the instant revisional application has become infructuous and disposed of.
Copy of the order be sent to the trial court for immediate compliance.
(Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)
Sudhanshu Bhakat
Ananya Bandyopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
