Petitioner filed a written instruction that she did not wish to proceed with the criminal revisional application; the revision, CRR 2917 of 2012, was dismissed for non-prosecution and a copy of the order was directed to be sent to the trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
06.02.2024 18 cm
CRR 2917 of 2012
In the matter of : Yasmin Taha
…. petitioner.
Mr. Debapratim Guha
… for the petitioner.
Mr. Avik Ghatak
… for the opposite party No.2.
The petitioner i.e. Yasmin Taha personally appeared before the learned Registrar Administration ( L & OM) on 05.02.2024 is noted and dispensed with.
The opposite party No. 2 i.e. Ruzada Begum personally appeared before the learned Registrar Administration ( L & OM) on 05.02.2024 is noted and dispensed with.
The report submitted by the respective advocates be kept on record.
The learned advocate for the petitioner files a written instruction that his client does not wish to proceed with the matter. A written instruction dated 05.02.2024 submitted before the court to that effect be kept on record.
Under the facts and circumstances, the instant criminal revesional application being CRR 2917 of 2012 is dismissed for non prosecution.
Copy of the order be sent to the trial court for due compliance.
(Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)
2
Yasmin Taha
Ruzada Begum
Ananya Bandyopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
