Criminal revisional application dismissed as not pressed after petitioner withdrew instructions to pursue the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
01-05-2024
Subha Item no. 32 Ct no.34
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction
CRR 1352 of 2024
Soumita Bag -versus-
The State of WB and anr.
Mr. Soyma Subhra Ray Ms. Priyanka Burman
…for the petitioner.
Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits his written instructions. Let the same be kept with the record. According to the instruction so received, the petitioner is not interested to pursue with the present revisional application.
Thus, the revisional application being CRR 1352 of 2024 is dismissed as not pressed.
All concerned parties are to act in terms of a copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this court.
[Tirthankar Ghosh, J]
2
Soumita Bag
The State of WB
anr.
Tirthankar Ghosh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
