Criminal revision application dismissed for non-prosecution after the petitioner filed written instructions not wishing to proceed, the underlying sessions trial having reached the judgment stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
21.02.2024 24 cm
CRR 2317 of 2012
In the matter of : Niranjan Rana.
… Petitioner.
Mr. Bhaskar Hutait
…. for the petitioner.
Mr. Hutait, learned advocate files fresh vakalatnama on behalf of the petitioner in Court today. Let the same be kept on record.
The petitioner is present in Court today. His personal appearance is noted and dispensed with.
The learned advocate for the petitioner submits that in Sessions Trial Case No. XXI of September, 1995 has proceeded to the stage of delivery of judgment and as such the instant revisional application has become infructuous.
The learned advocate for the petitioner has filed a written instruction that his client does not wish to proceed with the matter. A written instruction dated 20.02.2024 submitted before the court to that effect be kept on record.
Under the facts and circumstances, the instant criminal revesional application being CRR 2317 of 2012 is dismissed for non prosecution.
Copy of the order be sent to the trial court for due compliance.
2
(Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)
Niranjan Rana
Ananya Bandyopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
