Mahendra Kumar Nayak v. the Union of India & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition concerning service matters against the Union of India; petitioner's affidavit-in-reply taken on record and the matter adjourned to a later date for hearing. No substantive adjudication.
What the court decided
29.08.2025 Sl.No.47. D/L Ct. No.33 Mithun
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE
W.P.A. 23895 of 2017 With IA No: CAN 2 of 2024, CAN 3 of 2024
Mehendra Kumar Nayak
Versus
The Union of India & Ors.
Mr. Pawan Kumar Gupta,
Ms. Sofia Nesar,
Mr. Santanu Sett
... for the petitioner.
Mr. Indrajeet Dasgupta, Mr. Madhu Jana
…for the Union of India.
Affidavit-in-reply filed on behalf of the petitioner be kept on record. A copy of the same has been served upon the learned Advocate representing the respondents/Union of India.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mehendra Kumar Nayak
- respondent
The Union of India
Coram
Ananya Bandyopadhyay
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Calcutta HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- WPA/23895/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court