Dismissed¶16

R K Arora @ Ramesh Kr Arora & Ors. v. State of West Bengal and Anr.

Calcutta HC19 Apr 2024CRR/2228/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CRR 2228 of 2015; R. K. Arora @ Ramesh Kumar Arora & Ors. v. The State of West Bengal & Anr.; Calcutta High Court; Bibhas Ranjan De, J.; decided 19.04.2024; quashing of G.R. Case No.342 of 2014; Hare Street Police Station Case No.100 of 2014; Sections 120B/167/193/406/418/420 IPC; final report (mistake of fact) dated 20.07.2015; protest application; Metropolitan Magistrate 19th Court; cognizance under Section 200 Cr.P.C.; process issued 24.06.2022; CRR 3660 of 2022; revision dismissed as infructuous; pending applications dismissed.

What did the court decide?

The instant revisional application CRR 2228 of 2015 has become infructuous and stands dismissed. ¶16

R K Arora @ Ramesh Kr Arora & Ors. Vs State of West Bengal and Anr. — Calcutta HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

19.04.2024. p.b. Sl. No.13

¶2

CRR 2228 of 2015 with CRAN 1 of 2015 with CRAN 3178 of 2015

¶3

R. K. Arora @ Ramesh Kumar Arora & Ors. Vs.

¶4

The State of West Bengal & Anr.

¶5

Mr. Sourav Chatterjee, Ms. Usha Doshi.

¶6

……for the petitioners.

¶7

Mr. Binoy Kr. Panda, Mr. Subham Bhakat.

¶8

…….for the State.

¶9

Both the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant as well as State respondents are present.

¶10

This revisional application was filed on 10^th July, 2015 with a prayer for quashing of the proceedings of G.R. Case No.342 of 2014 pending before the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Calcutta, arising out of Hare Street Police Station Case No.100 of 2014 dated 8^th February, 2014 under Sections 120B/167/193/406/ 418/420 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶11

Mr. Chatterjee, learned advocate appearing on

¶12

behalf of the petitioner has submitted that the proceeding in connection with G.R. Case No.342 of 2014 was ended in final report (mistake of fact) on 20^th July, 2015.

¶13

¶14

Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the private opposite party has also submitted the same thing. It is submitted that against the final report, complainant filed a protest application which was transferred to the Court of Metropolitan Magistrate, 19^th Court by the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate. Accordingly, the Metropolitan Magistrate, 19^th Court examined the witnesses on S.A. under Section 200 Cr.P.C. and issue process against the accused on 24^th June, 2022 under Sections 167/193/406/418/420/ 120B of the Cr.P.C. fixing 22^nd August, 2022 for S.R. It is submitted that the order dated 24^th July, 2022 was assailed in separate revision application being CRR 3660 of 2022.

¶15

In the given situation the instant revisional application has become infructuous and liable to be dismissed.

¶16

Thus, the instant revisional application being CRR 2228 of 2015 stands dismissed being infructuous. All the pending applications are hereby dismissed accordingly.

¶17

All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

¶18

(Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)

¶19

R K Arora @ Ramesh Kr Arora & Ors. v. State of West Bengal and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R K Arora @ Ramesh Kr Arora & Ors. v. State of West Bengal and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sidhant Udyog Private Limited Vs Modern Infra Projects India Limited and Another

Dalim Pandey Vs Union of India

Sumit Kumar Addya @ Sumit Adhya Vs Badrinarayan Upadhyay

Indranil Chatterjee & Anr. Vs State of West Bengal & Anr.

Uma Das Vs State of West Bengal and Anr.

Sk. Golam Rasul Vs State of West Bengal