Disposed¶20

Sumit Kumar Addya @ Sumit Adhya v. Badrinarayan Upadhyay

Calcutta HC18 Apr 2024CRR/1399/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Calcutta High Court, Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction, CRR 1399 of 2015, decided 18.04.2024 by Bibhas Ranjan De, J. Sumit Kumar Addya @ Sumit Adhya v. Badrinarayan Upadhyay. Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881; Complaint Case No.539/C of 2010; Criminal Appeal No.46 of 2012; conviction dated 31.08.2012; fine Rs.2,00,000/- fully paid and withdrawn by complainant; petitioner set at liberty; recall of warrant directed; revision disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner set at liberty at once; learned Judicial Magistrate, 7th Court, Howrah requested to recall the warrant, if issued; copy of the order to be communicated to the learned Judicial Magistrate immediately for compliance. ¶20

Sumit Kumar Addya @ Sumit Adhya Vs Badrinarayan Upadhyay — Cheque Dishonour | Calcutta HC (2024)

¶1

19 18.04.2024 Court No.237 pg.

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE

¶3

CRR 1399 of 2015

¶4

Sumit Kumar Addya @ Sumit Adhya Vs.

¶5

Badrinarayan Upadhyay

¶6

Mr. Ayan Bhattacharjee

¶7

… For the petitioner

¶8

Mr. Anshuman Dutta

¶9

… For the opposite party

¶10

This revisional application has been filed assailing the judgment and order dated 30^th July, 2014 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, 3^rd Court at Howrah in connection with Criminal Appeal No.46 of 2012 whereby affirming the judgment and order dated 31^st August, 2012 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 7^th Court, Howrah in Complaint Case No.539/C of 2010 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 thereby convicting the petitioner to pay a fine of Rs.2,00,000/-, in default to suffer simple imprisonment for one year.

¶11

Mr. Ayan Bhattacharjee, learned advocate, appearing on behalf of the petitioner has drawn my attention to the orders passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 7^th Court, Howrah as well as passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, 3^rd Court, Howrah whereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge dismissed the appeal preferred against the judgment and order of conviction passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 7^th Court, Howrah and affirmed the judgment and order of

¶12

¶13

conviction dated 31^st August, 2012 imposing fine of Rs.2,00,000/- upon the petitioner, in default to suffer simple imprisonment for one year. Mr. Bhattacharjee has further submitted that the petitioner has already paid Rs.2,00,000/-.

¶14

Mr. Anshuman Dutta, learned advocate, appearing on behalf of the opposite party has submitted before this Court that the complainant has already received the entire amount in compliance with the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 7^th Court, Howrah.

¶15

In the given facts and circumstances, I find that the petitioner already paid all fine amount imposed upon him and that too the amount was also withdrawn by the complainant.

¶16

In the aforesaid view of the matter, the

¶17

accused/petitioner, namely, Sumit Kumar Addya @ Sumit Adhya be set at liberty at once.

¶18

It is submitted by Mr. Bhattacharjee that warrant was issued against the petitioner by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 7^th Court, Howrah.

¶19

The learned Judicial Magistrate, 7^th Court, Howrah is requested to recall the warrant, if issued at all.

¶20

With the aforesaid observation and direction, CRR 1399 of 2015 stands disposed of.

¶21

Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned Judicial Magistrate, 7^th Court, Howrah immediately for compliance.

¶22

¶23

Department is directed to send down the Lower Court Records forthwith.

¶24

All parties shall act on the basis of a server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

¶25

Criminal Section is directed to supply certified copy of this order, if applied for, upon compliance of necessary formalities.

¶26

(Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)

Sumit Kumar Addya @ Sumit Adhya v. Badrinarayan Upadhyay

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sumit Kumar Addya @ Sumit Adhya v. Badrinarayan Upadhyay

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Narayan Ch. Mondal Vs Gopal Chandra Murshid

Ganga Din Vs the Andaman and Nicobar Administration and Ors.

H.C.S Yadav Vs the State

Sidhant Udyog Private Limited Vs Modern Infra Projects India Limited and Another

Dalim Pandey Vs Union of India

Indranil Chatterjee & Anr. Vs State of West Bengal & Anr.