Criminal revision seeking quashing of a proceeding under Sections 341/325/506/427/34 IPC was withdrawn by the petitioners, who were granted liberty to raise all issues before the Trial Court at the time of consideration of charge. Pending applications dismissed and case diary returned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
10 22.04. 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ct CRIMINAL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION 237 APPELLATE SIDE
rup
CRR 1354 of 2015 IA NO: CRAN 3 of 2023
Smt. Neeta Chakraborty & Anr. Vs. The State of West Bengal & Anr.
Mr. Sandipan Ganguly, Sr. Adv. Mr. Amarta Ghosh, Ms. Rituparna De Ghosh, Mr. Siddhartha Paul, Mr. Souryadeep Ghosh. … for the petitioners. Mr. Pinak Mukar Mitra, Ms. Pallavi Pain. … for the O.P No.2. Mr. Binay Panda, Ms. Puspita Saha … for the State.
2
inclined to withdraw this revisional application with liberty to raise all the issues at the time of consideration of charge before the Trial Court.
(Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Neeta Chakraborty
The State of West Bengal
Bibhas Ranjan De
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
