Parimal Halder v. Kartick Halder & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Procedural dismissal-for-default of a revisional application (C.O. No.323 of 2017; Parimal Halder petitioner, Kartick Halder & Ors. opposite parties, counsel Ms. Priyanka Jana and Mr. Bikramjit Mandal for O.P. Nos. 1 & 2). Petitioner unrepresented despite service on two successive occasions; court inferred abandonment and dismissed for default; interim order vacated; no costs. Useful only as evidence of non-pursuance/vacation of interim protection; contains no ratio decidendi, statutory reference or precedent treatment. Court name not printed in the text.
What did the court decide?
Inferring from the petitioner's repeated non-representation that the petitioner is no longer interested in pursuing the matter, the court dismisses the revisional application C.O. 323 of 2017 for default. ¶8