Kartick Chandra Nag v. Shibdas Rakshit Modak & Ors.
Calcutta HCCO/2585/2017
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
A civil revision dismissed for default; the restoration application was lost by the court's Rule Section. The court treated a xerox copy of the restoration application as original, kept the departmental report on record, and directed notice and service on the opposite parties, fixing the matter for mention.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Item 24.04. No. 2025 01
¶2
Ct 22
¶3
rup
¶4
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE
¶5
CO 2585 of 2017 With IA NO: CAN 1 of 2024
¶6
Kartick Chandra Nag Vs
¶7
Sri Shibdas Rakshit Modak & Ors.
¶8
Mr. Subhas Chandra Atha, Ms. Payel Pramanik. … for the petitioner.
¶9
- Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that the instant revisional application was dismissed for default on 12.03.2024 and consequently one application for restoration of the same to its own file was filed and on query it is found that the said restoration application being CAN 1 of 2024 lost from the department.
¶10
- One report has been received by this Court from the Section Officer of Rule Section, wherefrom it is found that the said application being CAN 1 of 2024 in connection with CO 2585 of 2017 was received by the Rule Section on 27.06.2024, but subsequently the said application could not traced out despite search. However, department has sought for time to find out the same.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Kartick Chandra Nag
- respondent
Sri Shibdas Rakshit Modak
Coram
AI extract
Bibhas Ranjan De
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Calcutta HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- CO/2585/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court