The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the civil revisional jurisdiction application challenging the Trial Judge's order granting an adjournment in a title suit, holding the challenge misconceived.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
13.08.2024 Item No.11, DL
Ct.19
A.J.
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION
C.O. 2822 of 2024
Sri Nishi Kumar Samanta -VsSmt. Dali Samanta
Mr. Partha Pratim Roy, Mr. Anirban Das, Ms. Poulomi Chakraborty.
……for the petitioner.
The order dated May 15, 2024 passed by the 1st Court of the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Barasat, District : 24-Parganas (North) in Title Suit No.963 of 2018, a suit for declaration of title is under challenge in the instant application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
The petitioner is the plaintiff of the said suit. The learned Trial Judge by the order impugned has allowed the prayer of the plaintiff for adjournment, the challenge to the said order is misconceived.
C.O. 2822 of 2024 is dismissed without any order as to costs.
Urgent Photostat certified copies of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Biswajit Basu, J.)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri Nishi Kumar Samanta
Smt. Dali Samanta
Biswajit Basu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
