Remanded

Hindustan Motors Ltd. and v. State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC13 Jan 2023WPLRT/184/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition challenged the Tribunal's order refusing interim relief. The High Court remanded the matter to the Tribunal to hear the main petition within four months and directed the parties to maintain status quo over the property during the pendency.

What did the court decide?

Matter remanded to the Tribunal to hear the main petition within four months and maintain status quo over the property till 15 days after disposal.

Hindustan Motors Ltd. and Vs State of West Bengal — Service and Employment | Calcutta HC (2023)

¶1

13.01.2023 Court No.12 S/L. No.3 Sourav/ Suvayan

¶2

WPLRT 184 of 2022 With IA No: CAN 1 of 2023

¶3

Hindustan Motors Ltd. & Ors. Vs. State of West Bengal

¶4

Mr. Anindya Kumar Mitra, Sr. Adv. Mr. Arvind Jhunjhunwala Mr. Mainak Bose Mr. Rupak Ghosh Mr. Tridib Bose Mr. Debjyoti Saha

¶5

… for the petitioners.

¶6

Mr. S. N. Mookherjee, Ld. A.G. Mr. T. M. Siddiqui, Ld. A.G.P. Mr. Supratim Dhar

¶7

… for the State.

¶8

Heard Mr. Anindya Kumar Mitra, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr. S. N. Mookherjee, learned Advocate General appearing for the State.

¶9

This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners against the order of the Tribunal refusing interim relief to the petitioners.

¶10

Having heard learned Counsel for the parties and having perused the impugned order, we are of the considered view that the Tribunal is well within the jurisdiction to pass ad interim order and also interim order if the petitioners satisfy the Tribunal regarding the ingredients and on facts for passing such an order.

¶11

Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that he also wants to take some additional grounds before the Tribunal. There being no bar in law for taking additional

¶12

¶13

grounds before the Tribunal, the petitioners, if so advised, may file appropriate petition before the Tribunal for taking additional grounds by amending the petition or by filing appropriate rejoinder, which the Tribunal may allow, in accordance with law.

¶14

Taking into consideration the nature of the order passed, we think it just and proper and in the interest of justice to remand the matter before the Tribunal to hear and decide the main petition being OA No. 3775 of 2022 within four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order or server copy of this order supplied by any of the party after giving adequate opportunity of hearing to all the parties concerned.

¶15

The additional grounds, if any, be filed before the Tribunal by the petitioners by next Friday. Till disposal of the main petition as indicated (Supra), party shall maintain status quo over the property in question till 15 days after disposal of the matter.

¶16

In view of such order, learned Tribunal is not required to take up any ad interim application or interim application filed by learned Counsel for the parties.

¶17

In view of such order, the petition being WPLRT 184 of 2022 along with the interim application being CAN 1 of 2023 are disposed of.

¶18

(Chitta Ranjan Dash, J.)

¶19

(Partha Sarathi Sen, J.)

Hindustan Motors Ltd. and v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hindustan Motors Ltd. and v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bharati Sarkar Vs Dhanjay Barman & Ors.

Shukla Daw Vs State of West Bengal & Ors.

Dulal Chandra Das Vs State of W.B

Amiya Majilla Vs State

Amir Chand Mondal Vs State of West Bengal

Ibrahim Mondal Vs State of West Bengal