The present special leave petition and connected application for condonation of delay were listed for dismissal. As neither party appeared without seeking accommodation despite notice, the matter was disposed of for default.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; interim order vacated; application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
11.01.2023 Court No.12 S/L. No.3 Sourav/ Suvayan
FMA 1335 of 2018
With
IA No: CAN 1 of 2016 (Old No: CAN 6848 of 2016)
Bharati Sarkar Vs. Dhanjay Barman & Ors.
None had appeared for the parties when the matter was listed on earlier occasion, nor any accommodation was sought for.
Today also none appears for the parties, nor any accommodation is sought for, though the matter has been listed under the heading “For Dismissal” giving sufficient notice and warning to learned Counsel for the parties.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for nonprosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Interim application, if any, stands disposed of.
(Chitta Ranjan Dash, J.)
(Partha Sarathi Sen, J.)
Bharati Sarkar
Dhanjay Barman
Chitta Ranjan Dash
Partha Sarathi Sen
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
