The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed in 2014 by default, noting that no affidavits-in-opposition or replies were filed despite a direction to exchange them six years prior, indicating the petitioner's lack of interest in proceeding.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
06.07.2023 Sl. No.16. Mithun Ct.No.42.
WPA 8953 of 2014
Tuhin Mukherjee Vs.
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
The instant writ petition was filed in the year 2014. Direction was passed on 6th August, 2014 for exchange of affidavits. However, till date no affidavit-inopposition or reply has been filed by the learned Advocates for the parties. The conduct of the petitioner shows that he is not interested to proceed with the instant writ petition. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed for default.
(Bibek Chaudhuri, J.)
Tuhin Mukherjee
The State of West Bengal
Bibek Chaudhuri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
