Petitioner moved under habeas corpus. Counsel submitted victim recovered, no further order needed. Court disposed of petition; State filed report kept on record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
27.09.2023 rpan/ 01
WPA (H) 62 of 2023 Chandrika Chakraborty
– Versus – The State of West Bengal & Others
Mr. Palash Bapari
… for the Petitioner.
Ms. Amrita Panja Moulick … for the State.
The learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the victim has already been recovered.
In view thereof, no further order is required to be passed in the present habeas corpus petition and the same is, accordingly, disposed of.
Ms. Panja Moulick, learned advocate appearing for the State files a report. Let the same be kept on record.
(Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J.) (Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.)
Chandrika Chakraborty
The State of West Bengal
Partha Sarathi Chatterjee
Tapabrata Chakraborty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
