High Court dismissed writ petition WP.CT. 66 of 2012 as petitioners were absent despite notice. Interim order was vacated. No order as to costs.
Writ petition dismissed; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
9 26.09.2023 Ct. No. 11 rrc
WP.CT. 66 of 2012
(Union of India & Ors. Vs. Ahiram Mishra)
Mr. Sarajit Sen Mr. Tapas Singha Roy
….. For the respondent
The present writ petition has been preferred challenging an order dated 26th August, 2011 passed by the learned Tribunal in an original application being OA No. 1051 of 2009.
The matter last appeared before this Court on 22nd August, 2023 when none appeared on behalf of the petitioners in spite of notice. To give a last opportunity to the petitioners to appear and contest, the matter was adjourned with a direction upon the respondent to intimate the said order to the learned advocate, who had entered appearance on behalf of the petitioners and also to the petitioner nos. 1 and 2 and to file an affidavit-ofservice.
Pursuant to the said order, service has been effected but no one appears even today on behalf of the petitioners and no accommodation has been sought for. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in the matter any further. Let the affidavit-of-service, as filed, be kept on record.
In view thereof, the writ petition being WP.CT. 66 of 2012 is dismissed and the interim order is vacated.
2
There shall, however, be no order as to costs.
All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J.) (Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.)
Union of India & Ors.
Ahiram Mishra
Partha Sarathi Chatterjee
Tapabrata Chakraborty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
