The Calcutta High Court dismissed a writ petition by default as the petitioner failed to appear without seeking an adjournment, showing lack of interest to pursue the case. Any interim order was vacated.
The writ petition is dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
02 02.05.2023 pg.
Calcutta High Court In the Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri Appellate Jurisdiction
WPA 610 of 2023
Nitin Ahuja -versus
Union of India & Ors.
This matter was passed over on 1st May, 2023 as no one appeared in support of the writ petition. The matter was passed over in the first call today. In the second call, no one appears in support of the writ petition. No one has sought for any adjournment. No one has applied for representing the petitioner on virtual mode.
It is apparent that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the case.
The writ petition is dismissed for default.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Arindam Mukherjee, J.)
Nitin Ahuja
Union of India & Ors.
Arindam Mukherjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
