The court disposed of a service dispute regarding a cycle stand. It directed the respondent to expedite the tender finalization, maintain the status quo for the petitioner, and allowed participation in the new tender.
Respondent directed to expedite tender finalization; status quo maintained; petitioner permitted to participate.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S/L 3 24.7.2023 Court No.26 SD
WPA 51 of 2009
Sk. Hasanuddin
Vs.
South Eastern Railway & Ors.
Mr. Mohan Kr. Putatundu Mr. Abhinaba Chatterjee
… for the Petitioner.
Mr. Ajay Chaubey
… for the Respondents.
Heard counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submits that they shall expedite the process for finalization in respect of cycle stand as early as possible. He also submits that they have no objection in respect of petitioner’s running cycle stand till the new tender is issued by them.
Accordingly, respondent authorities are directed to expedite the process of finalization in respect of the cycle stand at the earliest.
Status quo shall continue with regard to the petitioner till the new tender process is completed.
Furthermore, I make it clear that petitioner shall be at liberty to participate in the said tender process.
With these observations, WPA 51 of 2009 is disposed
of.
There will be no order as to costs.
All parties are to act on the website copy of this order.
(Shekhar B. Saraf, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent authority should expedite the finalization of the cycle stand tender process while maintaining status quo for the petitioner.
Sk. Hasanuddin
South Eastern Railway
Shekhar B. Saraf
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
