The Court disposed of a contempt petition upon successful representation by counsel that the impugned order dated August 23, 2018, was complied with. Personal appearance was dispensed with.
Contempt petition disposed of; rule discharged; personal appearance dispensed with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
20.07.2023 104
ss
W.P.C.R.C. 124 of 2023
Swagatam Mukherjee
Vs.
Sri Sridhar Pramanik
Mr. Dwarikanath Mukherjee Mr. Manik Lal De Mr. Pradip Kr. Ghosh
… For the petitioner
Mr. Ranjan Saha … For the alleged contemnor
<,
Counsel appearing on behalf of the alleged contemnor submits that the order dated August 23, 2018, against which the contempt application has been filed, has been complied with in its entirety.
Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner agrees to the same.
In light of the above submission, no further order need be passed in the contempt proceeding.
Accordingly, the contempt petition is disposed of. Rule is discharged. Personal appearance of the alleged contemnor is dispensed with.
Compliance report submitted by the Counsel on behalf of the alleged contemnor be kept with the record.
(Shekhar B. Saraf, J.)
Swagatam Mukherjee
Sri Sridhar Pramanik
Shekhar B. Saraf
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
