The High Court dismissed W.P.A. 2593 of 2015 due to the petitioner's lost interest after multiple adjournments. Any interim order stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
10 08.02.2023 rkd Ct.15
W.P.A. 2593 of 2015
Mr. Subir Talukdar
-vs-
State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Bidhayak Lahiri, Md. Kalam, Ms. Bhaswati Lahiri
….for the petitioner.
The writ petition was taken up for consideration on 9th January, 2023 when no one appeared for the petitioner which led this Court to adjourn the matter in order to grant opportunity to the petitioner to be represented before the Court. Subsequently, matter was taken up for consideration on 30th January, 2023 when accommodation was prayed for on the ground of the learned advocate representing the petitioner. Acceding to such request matter was again adjourned and was fixed for hearing today, 8th February, 2023.
Today Mr. Lahiri, learned advocate appears for the petitioner and again prays for accommodation to obtain instruction.
It appears that petitioner has lost interest. The writ petition stands dismissed.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this
2
order, if applied for, be given to the learned Advocates for the parties on the usual undertakings.
(Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)
Mr. Subir Talukdar
State of West Bengal
Saugata Bhattacharyya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
