Disposed

Smt. Kamala Manna and Ors. v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Calcutta HC27 Sept 2023WPA/21259/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition regarding disputed land sale and pending FIR, the Supreme Court directed the Investigating Officer to conclude investigation expeditiously under DSP supervision before disposing the matter.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Investigating Officer to conclude investigation expeditiously under the supervision of DSP, Headquarters, Howrah (Rural) District.

Smt. Kamala Manna and Ors. Vs State of West Bengal… — Execution and Attachment | Calcutta HC (2023)

27.09.2023

ssi

Ct 14

WPA 21259 of 2023

¶6

Smt. Kamala Manna & ors. -vsState of West Bengal & ors.

¶7

Mr. Lal Mohan Basu

¶8

...for the petitioners

¶9

Mr. Biswabrata Basu Mallik

¶10

Mr. Tamal Taru Panda

¶11

...for the State Mr. Rafikul Islam Sardar …for the respondent no.8

¶12

Affidavit of service filed on behalf of the petitioners is taken on record.

¶13

Report filed on behalf of the State is also taken on record.

¶14

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits as follows. The petitioners are the owners of the land in question. However, the respondent no.7 falsely claiming to be owner of such land sold half of such property to the respondent no.8. Respondent nos. 9 and 10 were the witnesses in the said deed. An FIR was lodged in this regard. But the same has not been properly investigated. The accused are roaming around freely in the area. But the Investigating Officer says that they are absconding.

¶15

Learned counsel for the private respondent no.8 submits as follows. The respondent is the bonafide purchaser of the property in question. The respondent no.7

¶16

¶17

had every right to sell such property being the real owner. There is a civil suit pending in this regard.

¶18

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State relies on the report and submits as follows. Several raids were held to nab the accused. But, they are actually absconding.

¶19

It appears that some steps have been taken by the Investigating Officer in dealing with the case.

¶20

However, no accused have been arrested till date.

¶21

The report also indicates that there is a civil suit pending purportedly in connection with the said property.

¶22

Let the Investigating Officer conclude the investigation as expeditiously and in accordance with law.

¶23

The further investigation of the case shall be conducted under the supervision of the DSP, Headquarters, Howrah (Rural) District.

¶24

With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of.

¶25

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order be supplied to the parties, if applied for, as early as possible.

¶26

(Jay Sengupta, J.)

Smt. Kamala Manna and Ors. v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Kamala Manna and Ors. v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mediview Diagnostic Services & Ors. Vs State of W B & Ors.

Dr. Runu Saha Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Ranjit Kr. Keshri & Ors. Vs State of West Bengal & Ors.

Rojina Bibi @ Rejina Bibi and Ors. Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Sanatan Naskar Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Sk. Azad Ali Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.