In this writ petition, the petitioner complained of grievous assault and non-registration of an FIR. The State reported that an FIR had been lodged. The Court found the grievance redressed and disposed of the petition without any further order.
No further order; petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
September 27, 2023 AD 40 Court No.14 SG
WPA 21525 of 2023
Sk. Azad Ali vs State of West Bengal and others
Mr. Rajib Kumar Acharya Mr. Banshi Badan Maity
… for the petitioner
Mr. K.J. Yusuf Mr. Parikshit Goswami
… for the State
Affidavit of service filed by the petitioner is taken on record.
Report filed on behalf of the State is also taken on record. A copy of the same has been handed over to learned advocate for the petitioner.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits as follows. The petitioner was grievously assaulted at Howrah Railway Station when he returned from Panskura by train. He made a complaint before the concerned police authorities, but no FIR has been registered.
Learned advocate for the State relies on the report and submits that the grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed and an FIR has been lodged. The case is being investigated.
As the petitioner’s prime grievance of nonregistration of FIR has already been redressed, no further order need be passed.
2
With these observations, the writ petition is disposed
of.
Urgent certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.
[ Jay Sengupta, J. ]
Sk. Azad Ali
State of West Bengal
Jay Sengupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
