The High Court dismissed Writ Petition Application 21112 of 2023 at the petitioner's instance as it was not pressed by the learned advocate.
The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
15 29.09.2023 NB Ct. 14
WPA 21112 of 2023
Faruk Mallick Vs.
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Sanjib Mitra, Mr. Rajesh Kumar Shah. …for the petitioner.
Mr. Jayanta Samanta, Mr. Kushal Biswas. …for the State.
Mr. Masum Ali Sardar. …for the private respondent.
Learned advocate on record appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner would not like to press the same.
On the prayer of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order may be supplied to the parties expeditiously, if applied for.
(Jay Sengupta, J.)
Faruk Mallick
The State of West Bengal
Jay Sengupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
