A writ petition was filed with insufficient court fees, prompting the single judge to list it outside the current roster pending fee payment.
Matter removed from list; liberty to appear granted upon payment of full court fees.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. 17
10.10.2023 (AD 1) (S. Banerjee)
WPA 20335 of 2012
Sudarshan Mahato & Ors. Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors.
(File not here)
Mr. Asim Banerjee Ms. Mrinmoyee Roy Chowdhury Mr. Protip Mukherjee
… for the petitioners
This matter has been filed by 17 writ petitioners but full court fees have not been paid in respect of all of them.
As of now the matter goes out of list.
Liberty to mention the matter after payment of full court fees.
(Abhijit Gangopadhyay, J.)
Sudarshan Mahato & Ors.
State of West Bengal & Ors.
Abhijit Gangopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
