Circuit Bench at Port Blair dismissed WPA/4/2009 for default due to the petitioner's non-appearance and lack of representation, without adjudicating merits.
Writ Petition dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA [ CIRCUIT BENCH AT PORT BLAIR ]
…
WPA/4/2009
Shri Shajan T. Oommen … Petitioner Vs.
The Lieutenant Governor(Administrator) and Ors. … Respondents
Mr. Shatadru Chakraborty Mr. Dibesh Dwivedi …for the Respondents
September 29, 2023 (M.A.Mobin) Item No.2
Mr. Shatadru Chakraborty, learned Advocate appears on behalf of the Respondents. No one is representing the Writ Petitioner in this case.
Mr. Chakraborty, learned Advocate, indicates that on the matters similar to the present one, the Hon’ble Supreme Court has set aside the directions of this Court earlier, implying thereby that the cause of action of the present petitioner would also not be maintainable pursuant to the said order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court.
Be that as it may, without going into the merits of this case, this Court finds it proper to dismiss the Writ Petition for default in absence of any representation by the petitioner, in the case.
WPA/4/2009 is dismissed for default.
The compilation of documents submitted on behalf of the respondents be kept with the record.
(Rai Chattopadhyay, J.)
Shri Shajan T. Oommen
The Lieutenant Governor(Administrator)
Rai Chattopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
