Utpal Saha v. Krishnanagar Municipality & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
adeb W.P.A. 17501 of 2018 Utpal Saha Vs.…
adeb W.P.A. 17501 of 2018 Utpal Saha Vs.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
09.02.2023 adeb
1
W.P.A. 17501 of 2018
Utpal Saha
Vs.
Krishnanagar Municipality & Ors.
Mr. Kallol Guha Thakurata Md. Wasim Rahaman
…for the Petitioner
Mr. Sankar Halder …for the respondent nos. 1 & 3
Matter has been accommodated in the list under the heading “To Be Mentioned” at the instance of the learned advocate representing the petitioner.
Mr. Kallol Guha Thakurata, learned advocate representing the petitioner submits on instruction that the issue involved in this writ petition has already been settled as a result whereof petitioner does not want to proceed with the writ petition.
Krishnanagar Municipality is represented by learned advocate.
In view of submission being made on behalf of the petitioner the writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Urgent photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon usual undertakings.
(Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)
Utpal Saha
Krishnanagar Municipality
Respondents Others
Saugata Bhattacharyya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court