Petitioner sought an order regarding sanctioned leave. The court noted that leave had been sanctioned via a dated memorandum. The writ petition was disposed of without a specific order on costs.
The writ petition was disposed of without any order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
12 sandip Ct. 18 24.01.2023
W.P.A. 15798 of 2022
Tanusri Samanta (Barik)
Vs.
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Iqbal Hussain … For the petitioner.
Ms. Koyeli Bhattacharyya … For the WBBSE.
Learned counsel for the appearing parties submit that the grievance of the petitioner has been addressed as the Headmaster of the concerned School with the approval of the Administrator has sanctioned the leave, as prayed for by the petitioner.
Learned advocate for the petitioner files a photocopy of the memorandum dated January 03, 2023 whereby and whereunder such leave has been sanctioned, let the said memorandum be kept with the record.
In view of such development, no further order need be passed in the present writ petition, accordingly W.P.A. 15798 of 2022 is disposed of without any order as to costs.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Biswajit Basu, J.)
Tanusri Samanta (Barik)
The State of West Bengal
Biswajit Basu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
