Allowed

Parbati Sinha (Thapa) v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Calcutta HC20 Jan 2023WPA/192/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Calcutta High Court held that a retired Assistant Teacher is entitled to arrears of pension from the date following superannuation if she exercised the option to switch from CPF to Pension-cum-Gratuity and refunded the employer's share within the stipulated time. The Court directed the authorities to complete the exercise within twelve weeks.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner entitled to arrear pension from date following retirement; authorities directed to verify records and process claim within twelve weeks.

Parbati Sinha (Thapa) Vs State of West… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Calcutta HC (2023)

¶1

20.01.2023 Item No.2 Court No.18 P.Jana

¶2

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT In the Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri

¶3

Appellate Side W.P.A. 192 of 2023

¶4

Parbati Sinha (Thapa)

¶5

-Vs-

¶6

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

¶7

Mr. Keshab Chandra Das, Ms. Aparajita Mondal, Mr. Biplab Adak,

¶8

……for the petitioner.

¶9

Affidavit-of-service filed by the learned advocate

¶10

for the petitioner be kept with the record.

¶11

In spite of service, none appears on behalf of the State-respondents.

¶12

The petitioner was an Assistant Teacher and retired from her said service on superannuation on February 01, 2007.

¶13

The petitioner is claiming to have exercised option to switch over to Pension-cum-Gratuity from CPF-cum-Gratuity and refunded the employer’s share of contribution with interest and additional interest within the time limited by the notification of the Government of West Bengal bearing No. 749SE(L)/SL/5S-56/13(Pt-V) dated June 13, 2014.

¶14

The grievance of the petitioner is that the Pension Payment Order was issued with effect from the date of the aforesaid refund, instead from the date following the date of her retirement on superannuation.

¶15

The petitioner by the instant writ petition is praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to release the arrear

¶16

¶17

pension from the date following such date of retirement.

¶18

In view of the judgment of the Special Bench of this Court in the case of DISTRICT INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS(SE), KOLKATA vs. ABHIJIT BAIDYA reported in 2013(3) CHN (CAL) 711 and in view of subsequent clarification of some of the paragraphs of the said judgment by the Special Bench in its order dated September 30, 2019 on G.A. 464 of 2018 , the issue is no longer res integra .

¶19

The petitioner is entitled to the arrear pension, as prayed for. The concerned District Inspector of School (SE) is directed to verify the records expeditiously to ascertain as to whether the petitioner had exercised the said option and refunded the employer’s share of contribution within the time limited by the aforesaid notification dated June 13, 2014.

¶20

In the event, it is found that the said option was so exercised, the said authority shall process the claim of the petitioner for arrears of pension and shall forward the necessary recommendation and/or sanction to the Director of Pension, Provident Fund and Group Insurance, who, in turn, shall take steps to issue Revised Pension Payment Order in favour of the petitioner with effect from the date following the date of her retirement on superannuation and the concerned Treasury Officer, thereafter shall release the pension in accordance with the Revised Pension Payment Order.

¶21

¶22

Entire exercise in this regard is required to be completed within a period of twelve weeks from the date of communication of this order.

¶23

W.P.A. 192 of 2023 stands disposed of with the above directions. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶24

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.

¶25

(Biswajit Basu, J.)

Parbati Sinha (Thapa) v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Parbati Sinha (Thapa) v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dipak Kumar Jana Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Niren Bagchi Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Dipti Thakur Roy Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Tapasi Goswami Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Samaranjan Adak Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Rabia Khatun Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.