Petitioner sought electricity connection refused by Respondent citing load splitting risk. Court held this requires factual determination by Grievance Redressal Officer and granted liberty to approach same.
Liberty granted to approach the concerned Grievance Redressal Officer for resolution of the dispute regarding electricity connection.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
M/L. 5. September 4, 2023. MNS.
WPA No. 15771 of 2023
Md. Naim
Vs.
CESC Limited and another
Mr. Bidyut Kumar Halder, Mr. Indranil Halder, Ms. Neha Singh
… for the petitioner.
Mr. Debanjan Mukherji
…for the CESC Limited.
2
load, the matter falls for factual determination before the appropriate authority, that is, the Grievance Redressal Officer.
(Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to an electricity connection despite the electricity board's apprehension of load splitting.
Who is the appropriate authority to resolve a dispute regarding service connection based on load splitting allegations.
Md. Naim
CESC Limited
Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
