Manowar Mondal v. State of West Bengal and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner's writ petition was dismissed for default as no advocate appeared on his behalf for hearing.
The petitioner's writ petition was dismissed for default as no advocate appeared on his behalf for hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
3 28.06.2023 Ct. No. 32 rrc
WPA (H) 14 of 2021
(Manowar Mondal Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors.)
Mr. Sabir Ahmed
….. For the State
Records reveal that no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner when the matter was last taken up for hearing on 7th June, 2023.
Today also, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner and no accommodation has been sought for though Mr. Ahmed, learned advocate appearing for the State, is present.
In view thereof, the writ petition being WPA (H) 14 of 2021 is dismissed for default.
(Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J.) (Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.)
Manowar Mondal
The State of West Bengal
Partha Sarathi Chatterjee
Tapabrata Chakraborty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court