Habeas corpus petition dismissed as the missing petitioner's daughter had already been recovered during the pendency of the application, rendering further judicial interference unnecessary.
No further interference in the habeas corpus petition; order as to costs not passed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPA (H) 6 of 2022
27.06.23 Sl-07 Ct.32 (S.R.)
Goutam Naskar
v.
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Gobinda Chandra Baidya … for the petitioner.
Mr. Baidya, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner’s daughter, who was missing, had already been recovered during pendency of the present application.
In view thereof, no further interference is called for in the present habeas corpus petition and the same is, accordingly, disposed of.
There shall, however, be no order as to costs.
Urgent certified photocopy of this order, if applied for, be supplied as expeditiously as possible.
(Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J.) (Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.)
Goutam Naskar
The State of West Bengal
Partha Sarathi Chatterjee
Tapabrata Chakraborty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
