Disposal of a writ petition seeking direction to police for boundary wall construction. Court held boundary and title disputes are exclusively for civil courts and dismissed the petition.
Petition disposed of with costs; police are directed not to enter boundary disputes.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
22.06.2023. Court No.13 Item No. 5
ap
W.P.A. No. 11317 of 2023
Sri Mukto Polley & Anr. Versus The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Soumya Basu Roy Choudhuri,
Mr. Sarbenanda Sanyal.
…For the petitioners.
Mr. Dev Kumar Sharma.
…For the respondent nos.7 & 8.
Mr. Tanmoy Mukherjee, Mr. Souvik Das, Mr. Rudranil Das.
…For the respondent nos.5 & 6.
2
3
( Rajasekhar Mantha, J. )
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ court can direct police to construct a boundary wall or demarcate land when civil suits on title are pending.
Sri Mukto Polley & Anr.
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Rajasekhar Mantha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
