A contempt petition pending before the Calcutta High Court at Port Blair. The court found that the alleged contemnors had compliance with a conversion order after delay. They tendered an apology and were let off with a warning.
The alleged contemnors let off with a warning; no further punishment awarded; rule discharged with costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
22-06-2023 ct no. 13 Sl.2
sp
High Court at Calcutta Special Civil Writ Jurisdiction (Contempt) (Circuit Bench at Port Blair) Appellate Side
CPAN 20 of 2023 In WPA 975 of 2022 (Through Video Conference)
Shri Mohammed Ebrahim Jadwet & Anr.
-Versus-
Shri Suneel Anchipaka & Anr.
Mr. Mohammed Tabraiz
….for the petitioners
Mr. Shatadru Chakraborty, Mr. Dibesh Dwivedi, Mr. Ramendu Agarwal, Ms. Surbi Dhanuka …for the alleged contemnors
2
(Rajasekhar Mantha, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the alleged contemnor who delayed compliance with a permit conversion order should be punished for contempt.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
None cited in textReferred
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shri Mohammed Ebrahim Jadwet
Shri Suneel Anchipaka
Veditha Reddy
Rajasekhar Mantha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
