This court dismissed a suit in testamentary jurisdiction for default as neither party appeared on the listed date, with no accommodation sought and the petitioner showing lack of interest in proceeding.
TS/10/2017 is dismissed for default; any interim order stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
OD-47
ORDER SHEET
TS/10/2017
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Testamentary & Intestate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE
IN THE GOODS OF : SAVITRI MAHAJAN @ SAVITRI DEVI MAHAJAN, DEC.
-AND-
VIKRAM KUMAR MAHAJAN
-VS-
SUNANDAN KUMAR MAHAJAN
BEFORE:
The Hon’ble JUSTICE KRISHNA RAO Date : February 17, 2023.
The Court: None appears on behalf of either of the parties.
The matter was listed on 29th November, 2022 but on call none appeared on behalf of either of the parties and no accommodation was sought for and for the interest of justice, the case was adjourned till 13th December, 2022 with the rider that if none appears on behalf of the parties, appropriate orders will be passed. Today when the matter is called none appears on behalf of either of the parties and no accommodation is sought for.
It reveals from the record that the plaintiff is not interested to proceed with the matter and thus, this Court has no other alternative but to dismiss TS/10/2017 for default.
Accordingly, TS/10/2017 is dismissed for default.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(KRISHNA RAO, J.)
RS
SAVITRI MAHAJAN @ SAVITRI DEVI MAHAJAN, DEC.
VIKRAM KUMAR MAHAJAN
SUNANDAN KUMAR MAHAJAN
KRISHNA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
