Dayarani Mahato & Ors. v. United India Insurance Co. Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
BR FMAT 2681 of 2005 With IA No. CAN 2 of…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
05.12.2023 Item No. 05 BR
FMAT 2681 of 2005 With IA No. CAN 2 of 2009 (old No. CAN 3526 of 2009)
Dayarani Mahato & Ors. -vs-
United India Insurance Co. Ltd.
Mr. Sanjoy Paul … for the insurance co.
Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner. State is represented. Even on earlier occasions the appellant had not represented nor accommodation has been sought for.
Accordingly, FMAT 2681 of 2005 is dismissed for default. Consequently CAN 2 of 2009 (old No. CAN 3526 of 2009) is disposed of.
Let a copy of this order be sent to the learned trial Court for information.
Urgent xerox certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the learned advocate for the parties on usual undertakings.
( Ajay Kumar Gupta , J. )
2
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Dayarani Mahato & Ors.
- respondent
United India Insurance Co. Ltd.
Coram
Ajay Kumar Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Calcutta HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- FMAT/2681/2005
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court